Real World Speed
Performance profile from 131,019 user samples
76,706 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 54% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 54% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 595
54,313 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Device(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 22FD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 53% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 595
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+41%
69.1 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+14%
281 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
191 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+32%
145 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
285 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+43%
199 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
196 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+50%
131 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Better peak texture detail.
+18%
324 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
217 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+40%
155 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+50%
218 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
227 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+63%
139 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
203 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+30%
156 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+40%
58 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+25%
98 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+11%
66 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
233 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+45%
160 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+43%
88 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+33%
74 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+34%
63 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+25%
79 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+25%
123 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
114 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+16%
98 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+24%
101 fps
Market Share
Based on 11,364,563 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.82 % 1.94 % Hugely higher market share.
+137%
Value
Value For Money
74.2 % 96.8 % Much better value.
+31%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
112 % 115 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$550 $221 Much cheaper.
+60%
Age
Newest
41 Months 17 Months Much more recent.
+59%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
375 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+64%
228 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
323 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+67%
193 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
312 fps Much better lighting effects.
+61%
194 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
279 fps Much better reflection handling.
+57%
178 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $376Nvidia GTX 1070 $329Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i7-7700K $360AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback