Real World Speed
Performance profile from 48,283 user samples
48,283 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 74% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 74% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
90.7 % -9%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
325 fps +5% 310 fps -5%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
177 fps -9%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+8%
268 fps -8%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+6%
185 fps -6%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+6%
360 fps -6%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
215 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
194 fps -11%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+9%
300 fps -9%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
228 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+12%
204 fps -12%
Market Share
Based on 5,357,299 GPUs tested.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % -14% 122 % Slightly more popular.
+14%
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.06 % -155% 2.7 % Hugely higher market share.
+155%
Price
Price (score)
$560 -32% 424 USD Much cheaper.
+32%
Value
Value For Money
74.4 % -11% 82.8 % Slightly better value.
+11%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
381 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
329 fps -16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
322 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+12%
287 fps -12%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
320 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+14%
281 fps -14%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+11%
256 fps -11%
Age
Newest
29 Months -54% 18.8 Months Much more recent.
+54%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $319Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $222Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $153
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $18
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback