Real World Speed
Performance profile from 83,055 user samples
49,754 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 117% EVGA(3842 4991) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 65% MSI(1462 3233)
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 544
33,301 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Device(0000 0000) 3GB
Worst Bench: 61% Asus(1043 85B1)
Poor: 61% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 20th / 544
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+46%
67.5 % -46%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
324 fps Much better texture detail.
+69%
192 fps -69%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+31%
147 fps -31%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+46%
197 fps -46%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Faster complex splatting.
+26%
156 fps -26%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
388 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+79%
217 fps -79%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+39%
158 fps -39%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
337 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+58%
213 fps -58%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
230 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+35%
170 fps -35%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
254 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+55%
163 fps -55%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+35%
89 fps -35%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.8 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+60%
55.3 fps -60%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.1 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+73%
56 fps -73%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.4 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+39%
67.5 fps -39%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
143 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+58%
90.3 fps -58%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.6 fps Much Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+65%
46.3 fps -65%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
150 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+23%
123 fps -23%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87.1 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+82%
47.8 fps -82%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Hugely Better World of Warcraft fps.
+84%
54.6 fps -84%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+29%
92.7 fps -29%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
305 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+65%
184 fps -65%
Market Share
Based on 5,010,920 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.07 % -96% 2.1 % Hugely higher market share.
+96%
Value
Value For Money
74.2 % -36% 101 % Much better value.
+36%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % More popular.
+24%
86 % -24%
Price
Price (score)
$560 -64% $200 Much cheaper.
+64%
Age
Newest
28 Months -54% 13 Months Much more recent.
+54%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
393 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+73%
227 fps -73%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
330 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+72%
192 fps -72%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
319 fps Much better lighting effects.
+54%
207 fps -54%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
283 fps Much better reflection handling.
+59%
178 fps -59%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $295AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $119
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $711SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $152SanDisk Extreme 32GB $18
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback