Real World Speed
Performance profile from 419,794 user samples
86,474 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 58% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 593
333,320 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Zotac(19DA 1438)
Worst Bench: 62% Gigabyte(1458 371A)
Poor: 62% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 593
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
96.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
71.6 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps Much better texture detail.
+50%
214 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
190 fps Faster multi rendering.
+28%
149 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+35%
208 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
194 fps Faster complex splatting.
+20%
162 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
379 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+55%
244 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+29%
165 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
325 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+43%
227 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
225 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25%
180 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
208 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+29%
162 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+37%
61 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+21%
100 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
235 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+23%
190 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+10%
68 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+33%
73 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+26%
101 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+44%
58 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+13%
137 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+31%
77 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+9%
106 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+33%
100 fps
Market Share
Based on 10,192,114 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.83 % 6.02 % Hugely higher market share.
+625%
Value
Value For Money
73.9 % 95 % Better value.
+29%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
108 % 163 % Much more popular.
+51%
Price
Price (score)
$550 $240 Much cheaper.
+56%
Age
Newest
39 Months 25 Months Much more recent.
+36%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
427 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+71%
249 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
319 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+49%
214 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
315 fps Much better lighting effects.
+41%
223 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
278 fps Much better reflection handling.
+41%
197 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $245AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback