Real World Speed
Performance profile from 271,847 user samples
71,058 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 54% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 54% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 12th / 555
200,789 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3283)
Worst Bench: 65% Gigabyte(1458 3716)
Poor: 65% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 555
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
71.9 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps Much better texture detail.
+50%
214 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
191 fps Faster multi rendering.
+28%
149 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
285 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
209 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Faster complex splatting.
+20%
164 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
380 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+55%
245 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
215 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+29%
167 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+44%
228 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
227 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
180 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
250 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+54%
163 fps -54%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
99.7 fps -22%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81.4 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+33%
61.3 fps -33%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74.8 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) fps.
+19%
63 fps -19%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96.6 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+31%
74 fps -31%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+26%
73.9 fps -26%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
138 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+39%
99.1 fps -39%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+16%
133 fps -16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.8 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+45%
58.3 fps -45%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96.2 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+29%
74.5 fps -29%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+9%
108 fps -9%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
253 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+26%
200 fps -26%
Market Share
Based on 7,366,688 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.94 % 4.74 % Hugely higher market share.
+404%
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % 85.1 % Slightly better value.
+15%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % 153 % Much more popular.
+43%
Price
Price (score)
$550 $285 Much cheaper.
+48%
Age
Newest
33 Months 19 Months Much more recent.
+42%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
375 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+50%
250 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
323 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+50%
216 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
313 fps Much better lighting effects.
+39%
225 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
280 fps Much better reflection handling.
+43%
196 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $145
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback