Real World Speed
Performance profile from 320,622 user samples
69,904 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 65% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 590
250,718 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Zotac(19DA 1438)
Worst Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3281)
Poor: 63% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 590
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
71.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Much better texture detail.
+51%
213 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Faster multi rendering.
+30%
148 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
286 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
208 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Faster complex splatting.
+20%
164 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+57%
243 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
217 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+29%
168 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
329 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+44%
229 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
229 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+27%
180 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
250 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+54%
163 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
99.7 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82.3 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+34%
61.3 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81.1 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+21%
66.9 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.7 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+34%
73.4 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.6 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+36%
72.7 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+35%
99.9 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
153 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+13%
135 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85.3 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+47%
58.2 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+18%
76.2 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
117 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+9%
108 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
245 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+26%
195 fps
Market Share
Based on 8,379,515 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.88 % 5.61 % Hugely higher market share.
+538%
Value
Value For Money
74.8 % 82 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % 161 % Much more popular.
+52%
Price
Price (score)
$550 $300 Much cheaper.
+45%
Age
Newest
35 Months 21 Months Much more recent.
+40%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
379 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+51%
251 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
325 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+51%
215 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
317 fps Much better lighting effects.
+41%
225 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Much better reflection handling.
+43%
196 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $176AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $193SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback