Real World Speed
Performance profile from 144,122 user samples
68,953 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 66% Asus(1043 8549) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 66% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 550
75,169 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 177% Gigabyte(1458 3752)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 177%
SPEED RANK: 3rd / 550
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.1 % -58% 155 % Much faster effective speed.
+58%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
324 fps -72% 556 fps Much better texture detail.
+72%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps -32% 253 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+32%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
286 fps -75% 500 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+75%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
196 fps -40% 274 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+40%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
382 fps -71% 655 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+71%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
217 fps -31% 284 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+31%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps -75% 574 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+75%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps -37% 309 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+37%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
252 fps -1% 255 fps +1%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps -19% 143 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+19%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82.9 fps -34% 111 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+34%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.5 fps -38% 135 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+38%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.6 fps -42% 135 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+42%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps -15% 158 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+15%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81.5 fps -54% 126 fps Much Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+54%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
157 fps -26% 197 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+26%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.7 fps -28% 109 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+28%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.1 fps -22% 116 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+22%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps -12% 133 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+12%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
277 fps -1% 279 fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 6,867,838 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.9 % -254% 3.19 % Hugely higher market share.
+254%
Value
Value For Money
74.8 % -26% 94.5 % Better value.
+26%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % -23% 130 % More popular.
+23%
Price
Price (score)
$550 Cheaper.
+28%
$769 -28%
Age
Newest
32 Months -69% 10 Months Much more recent.
+69%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
375 fps -58% 592 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+58%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
324 fps -69% 547 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
318 fps -55% 492 fps Much better lighting effects.
+55%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
283 fps -68% 476 fps Much better reflection handling.
+68%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Hyped as the "Ultimate GEforce", the 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's latest flagship 4K VR ready GPU. It supersedes last years GTX 1080, offering a 30% increase in performance for a 40% premium (founders edition 1080 Tis will be priced at $699, pushing down the price of the 1080 to $499). It also supersedes the prohibitively expensive Titan X Pascal, pushing it off poll position in performance rankings. The 1080 Ti is based on the Pascal architecture and features a slightly modified version of the same flagship GP102 silicon found in the Titan X Pascal. It has 11GB of the high bandwidth GDDR5X video memory (versus 12GB in the Titan X Pascal) and an impressive 11GB frame buffer. Like the Titan X Pascal, it features 12bn transistors and 3584 CUDA cores which can run at a boost clock speed of 1.582 GHz – 3% faster than the Titan X Pascal's 1.531 GHz. This increased speed is partially attributable to the 1080 Ti’s new dualFET power system which allows the chip to run at higher power and more efficiently than ever before. The release of the 1080 Ti comes ahead of the competition from AMD's Vega - rumored for release in Q2 2017. Vega is AMD's next generation graphics card (following on from Polaris 10) featuring their new HBM2 die which is alleged to have eight times the capacity of GDDR5 with half of the footprint. NVDIA's own next generation graphics cards (Volta) are in the pipeline for 2018. [Mar '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2018 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $210AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $53Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback