Real World Speed
Performance profile from 85,638 user samples
53,706 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 73% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 544
31,932 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 180% Asus(1043 85E4)
Worst Bench: 60% Nvidia(10DE 120F)
Poor: 60% Great: 180%
SPEED RANK: 1st / 544
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
99.2 % -57% 156 % Much faster effective speed.
+57%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
325 fps -70% 553 fps Much better texture detail.
+70%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps -35% 261 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+35%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps -74% 502 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+74%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
199 fps -40% 278 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+40%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
386 fps -70% 655 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+70%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
215 fps -35% 290 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+35%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps -75% 573 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+75%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
227 fps -37% 310 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+37%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
254 fps -2% 259 fps +2%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps -17% 140 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+17%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.8 fps -13% 100 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+13%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.1 fps -41% 137 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+41%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
143 fps -10% 157 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87.1 fps -22% 106 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+22%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
305 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+10%
277 fps -10%
Market Share
Based on 5,072,163 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.04 % -182% 2.93 % Hugely higher market share.
+182%
Value
Value For Money
74.8 % -29% 96.3 % Better value.
+29%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % -12% 120 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$560 Cheaper.
+26%
$754 -26%
Age
Newest
28 Months -79% 6 Months Much more recent.
+79%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
477 fps -25% 595 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+25%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
323 fps -72% 557 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+72%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
325 fps -51% 492 fps Much better lighting effects.
+51%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
285 fps -69% 483 fps Much better reflection handling.
+69%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Hyped as the "Ultimate GEforce", the 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's latest flagship 4K VR ready GPU. It supersedes last years GTX 1080, offering a 30% increase in performance for a 40% premium (founders edition 1080 Tis will be priced at $699, pushing down the price of the 1080 to $499). It also supersedes the prohibitively expensive Titan X Pascal, pushing it off poll position in performance rankings. The 1080 Ti is based on the Pascal architecture and features a slightly modified version of the same flagship GP102 silicon found in the Titan X Pascal. It has 11GB of the high bandwidth GDDR5X video memory (versus 12GB in the Titan X Pascal) and an impressive 11GB frame buffer. Like the Titan X Pascal, it features 12bn transistors and 3584 CUDA cores which can run at a boost clock speed of 1.582 GHz – 3% faster than the Titan X Pascal's 1.531 GHz. This increased speed is partially attributable to the 1080 Ti’s new dualFET power system which allows the chip to run at higher power and more efficiently than ever before. The release of the 1080 Ti comes ahead of the competition from AMD's Vega - rumored for release in Q2 2017. Vega is AMD's next generation graphics card (following on from Polaris 10) featuring their new HBM2 die which is alleged to have eight times the capacity of GDDR5 with half of the footprint. NVDIA's own next generation graphics cards (Volta) are in the pipeline for 2018. [Mar '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $297Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $152SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback