Real World Speed
Performance profile from 111,382 user samples
72,871 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3252) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 79% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 584
38,511 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% EVGA(3842 2956) 2GB
Worst Bench: 28% Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
Poor: 28% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 584
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.3 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+196%
33.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
323 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+236%
96.2 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+157%
75.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
287 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+206%
93.9 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+171%
72.6 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
380 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+245%
110 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
216 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+166%
81.3 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
329 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+213%
105 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
228 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+183%
80.5 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
250 fps Hugely Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+103%
123 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Hugely Better Overwatch fps.
+84%
66 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81.8 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+124%
36.5 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.6 fps Hugely Better Fallout 4 fps.
+126%
43.7 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+168%
50.4 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
153 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+61%
95 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+77%
67.1 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
245 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+79%
137 fps
Market Share
Based on 8,300,601 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.93 % Much higher market share.
+60%
0.58 %
Value
Value For Money
75 % Much better value.
+38%
54.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % Much more popular.
+42%
73 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $176 Much cheaper.
+68%
Age
Newest
35 Months 32 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
378 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+215%
120 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
321 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+237%
95.2 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
318 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+203%
105 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
282 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+230%
85.5 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 950 is Nvidia's latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia's energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it's also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn't offer improved value for money. Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here[Aug '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $310Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $135
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback