Real World Speed
Performance profile from 75,363 user samples
50,749 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% EVGA(3842 4995)
Worst Bench: 54% EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 54% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 9th / 544
24,614 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% EVGA(3842 2958)
Worst Bench: 29% Asus(1043 8569) 2GB
Poor: 29% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 544
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.8 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+192%
33.5 % -192%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
321 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+232%
96.8 fps -232%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+153%
75.8 fps -153%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
285 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+200%
95 fps -200%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+169%
73.2 fps -169%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
383 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+248%
110 fps -248%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
217 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+164%
82.2 fps -164%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
329 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+213%
105 fps -213%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
228 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+181%
81.2 fps -181%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
254 fps Hugely Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+109%
122 fps -109%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Hugely Better Overwatch fps.
+87%
64 fps -87%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.8 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+175%
32.3 fps -175%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
143 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+148%
57.7 fps -148%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
150 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+59%
94.7 fps -59%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+79%
66.7 fps -79%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
305 fps Hugely Better League of Legends fps.
+107%
147 fps -107%
Market Share
Based on 4,624,067 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.23 % Much higher market share.
+64%
0.75 % -64%
Value
Value For Money
73.7 % Slightly better value.
+13%
65.3 % -13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % Much more popular.
+62%
64 % -62%
Price
Price (score)
$560 -76% $135 Much cheaper.
+76%
Age
Newest
27 Months -11% 24 Months Slightly more recent.
+11%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
388 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+221%
121 fps -221%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
326 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+240%
96 fps -240%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
317 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+199%
106 fps -199%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+227%
85.9 fps -227%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 950 is Nvidia's latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia's energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it's also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn't offer improved value for money. Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here[Aug '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $307Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $291AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $130
Intel Core i5-7600K $217Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $287Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $155
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $134SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback