Real World Speed
Performance profile from 78,387 user samples
5,516 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Asus(1043 8539)
Worst Bench: 56% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 584
72,871 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3252) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 79% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 584
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
93.3 % 98.3 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+5%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
308 fps 323 fps +5%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
177 fps 193 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
271 fps 287 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+6%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps 197 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
371 fps 380 fps +2%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
201 fps 216 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
314 fps 329 fps +5%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
216 fps 228 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
300 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+20%
250 fps
Market Share
Based on 8,320,149 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.07 % 0.89 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,171%
Value
Value For Money
45 % 75 % Much better value.
+67%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
68 % 105 % Much more popular.
+54%
Price
Price (score)
$1,096 $550 Much cheaper.
+50%
Age
Newest
37 Months 35 Months Slightly more recent.
+5%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
502 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+33%
378 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
322 fps +0% 321 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
312 fps 318 fps +2%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
276 fps 282 fps +2%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX Titan X is based on the same Maxwell architecture as its market leading sibling, the GTX 980. In terms of specs the Titan X is basically one and a half GTX 980s with 50% more CUDA cores, 50% more texture units and 50% more transistors. Comparing the performance profiles of the GTX 980 and Titan X shows that the Titan X leads by 36% which is broadly proportional to its improved hardware specs. With performance up by 36% and prices up by nearly 100% the Titan X is a hard sell from a value perspective. Two GTX 980s cost roughly the same as one Titan X and in SLI outperform a single Titan X by around 50%. The Titan X obviously isn't aimed at value conscious buyers but if you are in the market for the fastest single consumer graphics card money can buy, then the Titan X will hit the spot perfectly. [Mar '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback