The NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX or the G92 that was released on March 28 of 2008 was considered to be the fastest GeForce 9 GPU before the release of the GTX 100 and GTX 200 series along with Half of the price of the 8800 GTX. It was considered to be the next king after the release of the 8800 GTX, was considered to be powerful. It's specifications is that it had a Process size of 65nm, a Transistor count of 754 Million along with a Die Size of 324mm^2. The Clock speeds were 675 MHz for the GPU, 1.688 GHz for the Shader Clock, and 1.1GB (1100 MHz) and 2.2GBps effective. It had a Length of 267mm or 10.5 In, a Width of 111mm or 4.4 In, a Height of 38mm or 1.5 In with a TDP of 140W, PSU of 300W, and an Output of 2 DVIs and 1 S-Video. It has a GDDR3 Memory @ 512 MB with a 256 bit and a 70.40 GB/s. It had 128 SU, 64 TMUs, 16 ROPs and SMs, and an L2 Cache of 64 KB. It has a Theoretical Preformance of 10.80 GPixel/s, 43.20GTexel/s, and 432.1GFLOPS.
There was another Variant that was considered to be the First and Last GTX+, which was the 9800 GTX+. For the Test on Jaindike's video, It got around 40-45 FPS on Rocket League and Counter Strike: Global Offensive, and Over 100+ FPS on Minecraft along with 90-100 in Insurgency. [Dec '205912352351]
The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15GPUPro]
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.