CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
293 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+24%
236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
136 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+74%
78 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
221 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+126%
98 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
174 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+85%
94 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
199 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+70%
117 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 449,999 user samples
357,946 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 174% Gigabyte(1458 37BB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 128% Asus(1043 8667)
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 714
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
156 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+99%
78 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
209 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+113%
98.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+98%
105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
257 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+190%
88.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
211 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+85%
114 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
239 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+119%
109 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+175%
112 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
286 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+204%
94.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
240 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+88%
128 fps
Market Share
Based on 67,422,623 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.55 % Hugely higher market share.
+686%
0.07 %
Value
Value For Money
83.6 % 109 % Much better value.
+30%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
72 % More popular.
+24%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$441 $170 Much cheaper.
+61%
Age
Newest
66 Months More recent.
+18%
80 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
268 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+53%
175 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
184 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+137%
77.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
231 fps Much better texture detail.
+49%
155 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+119%
74.5 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback