Average Bench: 36.6% (54th of 544)

Based on 12,504 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1183 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Poor average bench

The Nvidia GTX 660 Ti averaged 63.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 115fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 98.9fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 660 Ti is just 8.64%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 660 Ti performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 83.9fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 63.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 12,504 samples)
Min Avg Max
83.3 Lighting 98.9 111
72.2 Reflection 83.9 92.7
107 Parallax 130 148
34% 104 fps
Min Avg Max
76.7 MRender 83.4 88.2
93.2 Gravity 115 132
57.9 Splatting 63.8 70.1
38.4% 87.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 8420) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28
Lighting 108
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 143
37% 114 fps
MRender 84.6
Gravity 128
Splatting 69.1
41% 94 fps
Gigabyte(1458 3556) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 130
34% 104 fps
MRender 85.2
Gravity 115
Splatting 65
39% 88.5 fps
EVGA(3842 4069) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 309.8
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 119
32% 101 fps
MRender 86.3
Gravity 120
Splatting 68
40% 91.3 fps
MSI(1462 2824) 3GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.28
Lighting 97
Reflection 85.3
Parallax 129
34% 104 fps
MRender 84.5
Gravity 112
Splatting 63.4
38% 86.8 fps
12,504 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 4,687,013 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 12,504 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
MSI(1462 2843) 12% 39% ± 3%
Asus(1043 841F) 12% 37% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 3552) 10% 38% ± 4%
Asus(1043 841E) 9% 36% ± 3%
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 8% 35% ± 4%
EVGA(3842 3660) 7% 34% ± 2%
EVGA(3842 3662) 5% 36% ± 3%
Zotac(19DA 1280) 4% 36% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3556) 4% 34% ± 7%
Asus(1043 8420) 3% 39% ± 3%
Palit(1569 1183) 3% 36% ± 4%
EVGA(3842 3663) 3% 36% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2845) 3% 38% ± 2%
Gainward(10B0 1183) 3% 36% ± 2%
PNY(196E 1000) 2% 35% ± 1%
Asus(1043 844E) 2% 37% ± 2%
EVGA(3842 3664) 2% 38% ± 2%
EVGA(3842 4069) 1% 35% ± 4%
EVGA(3842 3661) 1% 36% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3559) 1% 40% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2824) 1% 32% ± 7%
Device(0000 0000) 1% 36% ± 2%
Device(107D 2745) 1% 35% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3668) 1% 38% ± 3%
EVGA(3842 3665) 0% 38% ± 5%
EVGA(3842 3667) 0% 39% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 662A) 0% 29% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 660 Ti Builds (Compare 7,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,213

Popular GTX 660 Ti compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

 Comments

Added 3 years ago.

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

24 days ago.

Comment 

excellent card plays everything on ultra high non sli (incl. far cry 4, wolfenstein, and anything else to come with ease) paired with i7 3770k@4.3 and z77msi. 16G ram. i can overclock the card quite a bit but there is no need for it. —Jan '15


Poor

1 month ago.

Works perfect in my Rig. ;)


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 18 pages, please contribute.


544 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $118
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback