Average Bench: 45.1% (43rd of 543)

Based on 1,406 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6939 Model: AMD Radeon R9 200

Below average average bench

The AMD R9 285 averaged 54.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 101fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 128fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 285 is just 9.42%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 285 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 125fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 113fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,406 samples)
Min Avg Max
108 Lighting 128 137
113 Reflection 125 134
140 Parallax 162 187
42.7% 138 fps
Min Avg Max
95.2 MRender 101 106
103 Gravity 113 121
79.9 Splatting 84.5 90.3
50.3% 99.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Lighting 149
Reflection 157
Parallax 204
52% 170 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 136
Splatting 98.3
55% 114 fps
Gigabyte(1458 229D) 2GB
CLim: 973 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 128
Reflection 127
Parallax 180
45% 145 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 113
Splatting 84.6
51% 99.8 fps
Asus(1043 0486) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 133
Reflection 126
Parallax 162
44% 140 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 115
Splatting 84.8
51% 101 fps
PowerColor(148C 9380) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Lighting 126
Reflection 132
Parallax 162
42% 140 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 110
Splatting 83.3
51% 98.8 fps
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 127
Reflection 127
Parallax 156
42% 137 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 114
Splatting 84.4
50% 99.7 fps
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.2
Lighting 110
Reflection 110
Parallax 112
33% 110 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 115
Splatting 86.5
51% 101 fps
1,406 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 4,313,463 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,406 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E306) 26% 45% ± 5%
Sapphire R9 285 2GB Dual-X OC
11235-03-20G
AmazonUS $219.9930 days ago.
EbayUS $232.996 mins ago.
Asus(1043 0486) 15% 46% ± 4%
MSI(1462 3140) 11% 45% ± 4%
MSI R9 285 2GB GAMING
R9 285 GAMING 2G
AmazonUS $261.966 months ago.
EbayUS $722.686 mins ago.
XFX(1682 9285) 10% 45% ± 3%
PowerColor(148C 2349) 9% 45% ± 4%
PowerColor R9 285 2GB Turbo Duo
AXR9 285 2GBD5-TDHE
AmazonUS $189.0015 months ago.
PowerColor(148C 9380) 8% 44% ± 5%
Gigabyte(1458 229D) 7% 47% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E305) 4% 44% ± 3%
PwrHis(1787 2349) 4% 46% ± 4%
Asus(1043 8683) 2% 40% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 200F) 2% 47% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E315) 1% 45% ± 1%
HP(103C 6896) 1% 43% ± 1%
Dell(1028 068B) 0% 47% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0B00) 0% 46% ± 0%
Device(1545 9285) 0% 45% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 285 Builds (Compare 10,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $612

Popular R9 285 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

 Comments

Added 2 years ago.

Good

4 months ago.

Great performance for price


Good

15 months ago.

AMD - OutStanding


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 64 pages, please contribute.


543 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
Intel Core i5-7600K $224Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $132SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback