Average Bench: 23.5% (191st of 714)

Based on 3,914 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 13D9 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Very poor average bench

The Nvidia GTX 965M averaged 76.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 30.5fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 23.8fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 965M is just 4.25%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 965M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 32.4fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 28.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,914 samples)
Min Avg Max
27.1 Lighting 30.5 32.3
28.1 Reflection 32.4 43.1
24 Parallax 28.1 30.8
24.9% 30.3 fps
Min Avg Max
16.8 MRender 25 27.1
26.2 Gravity 28.1 29.4
21.6 Splatting 23.8 25.5
20.9% 25.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 1102) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4219
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 32.8
29% 35 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 28
24% 29.1 fps
Asus(1043 171D) 2GB
CLim: 949 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.57
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 28.6
26% 30.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 24.8
22% 26.4 fps
Asus(1043 171D) 2GB
CLim: 949 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.12
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 28.6
25% 30.3 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 24.8
22% 26.5 fps
Microsoft(1414 0020) 2GB
CLim: 949 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 26.9
24% 28.8 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 23.7
21% 25.2 fps
MSI(1462 1134) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5212
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 27.7
24% 29.5 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 25
20% 23.6 fps
Microsoft(1414 0020) 2GB
CLim: 949 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 25.4
22% 22.9 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 22.6
19% 23.6 fps
Asus(1043 171D) 2GB
CLim: 1084 MHz, MLim: 1452 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.57
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 24
Parallax 15.8
26% 23.7 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.9
9% 10.3 fps
3,914 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,423,720 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 3,914 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 171D) 50% 24% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0708) 15% 23% ± 1%
Microsoft(1414 0020) 12% 23% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1125) 7% 23% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0685) 4% 23% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1134) 3% 23% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1102) 2% 24% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1103) 2% 24% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 6557) 1% 24% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 7702) 1% 24% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 0376) 0% 24% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 7502) 0% 23% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 2555) 0% 21% ± 4%
Clevo(1558 6541) 0% 24% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 7500) 0% 24% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 B556) 0% 22% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 6780) 0% 23% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 1464) 0% 24% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 7700) 0% 24% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3756) 0% 25% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 B456) 0% 25% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 A456) 0% 25% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 965M Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G751JL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular GTX 965M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Average (edit your comment) Add link

6 months ago.

This is what comes with the first Surface Book. It does work pretty well as a low end gaming GPU, you can even run select Xbox 360 games, but you aren't actually getting that much power out of it and it can suffer quite a bit when running modern PC games.


Good

12 months ago.

I had my laptop for three years and this card was amazing for the price. I could even play Arma 3 at acceptable frames. Beast of a card back in the day.


Excellent

3 years ago.

Best budget card back then in 2016/2017. The 4gb version can still run any game until 2017, even the newer ones on medium graphics. Best price-performance card back in the day. I did never regret buying it.


Good

8 months ago.

its alright but desktop cards are way better


Good

4 years ago.

Runs Battlefield 1, Titanfall 2 60 fps medium to high settings


Good

3 years ago.

Can run any game at 1080p medium/high with 60fps, more demanding titles will run at 40 or 50 fps if you don't lower the settings a bit. Great price performance.


Poor

6 years ago.

it's slow, i have to play fallout 4 on low. i'm so glad i'm upgrading because this poop can barely run crap


Good

5 years ago.

Decent performance per watt while staying relatively cool. Unfortunately will struggle with certain games at 1080p at much higher than Medium settings (depending on the game) you will need to adjust your in-game settings down to achieve a balance between a steady 60fps and eye candy.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback