Average Bench: 71.3% (29th of 584)

Based on 236 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Nano Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury, ASUS R9 NANO

Good average bench

The AMD R9 Nano averaged 28.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 202fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 206fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Nano is just 15.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Nano performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 142fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 115fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 236 samples)
Min Avg Max
159 Lighting 202 241
125 Reflection 142 153
245 Parallax 304 346
73.9% 216 fps
Min Avg Max
107 MRender 115 125
185 Gravity 206 244
147 Splatting 163 176
69.4% 162 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 974 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Lighting 220
Reflection 136
Parallax 330
80% 229 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 223
Splatting 154
71% 162 fps
CLim: 1120 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Lighting 205
Reflection 161
Parallax 319
76% 229 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 202
Splatting 181
73% 171 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.3
Lighting 211
Reflection 143
Parallax 298
75% 217 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 216
Splatting 165
72% 166 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Lighting 204
Reflection 142
Parallax 307
75% 218 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 200
Splatting 163
68% 160 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.2
Lighting 203
Reflection 144
Parallax 308
75% 218 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 189
Splatting 167
67% 158 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Lighting 157
Reflection 147
Parallax 321
67% 208 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 215
Splatting 167
72% 167 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.2
Lighting 198
Reflection 145
Parallax 303
73% 215 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 195
Splatting 165
67% 158 fps
236 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 8,310,483 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 236 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 04A4) 55% 73% ± 6%
Asus R9 Nano 4GB
R9NANO-4GB
AmazonUS $65013 months
EbayUS $1,31816 mins
Asus R9 Nano 4GB White
R9NANO-4G-WHITE
AmazonUS $66017 months
Gigabyte(1458 22C6) 45% 69% ± 9%
Gigabyte R9 Nano 4GB
GV-R9NANO-4GD-B
AmazonUS $45014 months
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Nano Builds (Compare 1,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,255

Popular R9 Nano compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

18 days ago.

Got it at 250€ in 2018, a beast!


Excellent

6 months ago.

In 2017 I have seen this GPU much cheaper and who it works is simply awesome, better than gtx 1060 6gb in my opinion


Your
opinion?
584 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $286AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback