Average Bench: 54.3% (120th of 714)

Based on 504 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Nano Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury, ASUS R9 NANO

Average average bench

The AMD R9 Nano averaged 45.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 67.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 63fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Nano is just 8.64%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Nano performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 58.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 98.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 504 samples)
Min Avg Max
61.8 Lighting 67.7 74.7
53.3 Reflection 58.7 67.5
90.8 Parallax 98.8 108
55.2% 75.1 fps
Min Avg Max
54.8 MRender 57.3 60.4
64.8 Gravity 72.2 77.8
40.5 Splatting 63 75.6
52.6% 64.2 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 77.6
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 111
63% 84.9 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 85
Splatting 40.5
49% 61.8 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 99.5
60% 82.1 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 41
45% 57.1 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Lighting 43
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 62.8
35% 57.7 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 41
40% 49.5 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 30
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 106
24% 59.1 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 40.6
39% 48.5 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 69
1% 24.8 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 68
Splatting 40.5
44% 55.1 fps
504 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,420,712 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 504 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Gigabyte(1458 22C6) 53% 53% ± 4%
Gigabyte R9 Nano 4GB
GV-R9NANO-4GD-B
AmazonUS $4507 years
Asus(1043 04A4) 47% 55% ± 3%
Asus R9 Nano 4GB
R9NANO-4GB
AmazonUS $6507 years
Asus R9 Nano 4GB White
R9NANO-4G-WHITE
AmazonUS $6607 years
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Nano Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Asus ROG Strix GL12CX_GL12CX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $702

Popular R9 Nano systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

3 years ago.

In January of 2021, this card still holds up at 1080p, with some games just needing textures dropped down a bit to accommodate the only 4GB of VRAM. However, it's a very hot running card that draws a lot of power relative to similarly performing modern cards. It remains an SFF builder collector's item, feels great to hold and is very satisfying to look at, as not many cards are built as special as this these days. Definitely going on my display shelf once I upgrade.


Good

2 years ago.

still useing one in 2020 and it still dose great


Excellent

2 years ago.

Still outperforming a 2 year old GTX 1650... Tuned with a better fan etc. it is still very nice in a small chassis, although it has only 4GB. However, it is currently impossible to get one anywhere... and you need to go for these overprized more recent GCs...


Good

5 years ago.

Got it at 250€ in 2018, a beast!


Average

5 years ago.

Notice the performance drop with the newest drivers. First they gimp fury on API level and block HBM overclocking. On last 2017 drivers I could oc core to 1120Mhz, and memory to 560Mhz on stock voltage stable. Now I can do 1080Mhz core which is 40mhz less, and the memory ( that you can only change by modifying bios, and even then some people say it's forcefully locked to 500Mhz anyway ) I haven't even checked HBM oc yet. Will do, probably will be stable on 545Mhz if I had to guess. If AMD is gimping older generation gpu on purpose and the performance will continue to drop without giving any official and logical explanation I will say goodbye to their gpu's. Not nice AMD, not nice at all.


Excellent

5 years ago.

not Titan Killer,280X and 290X is Titan Killers. R9 Fury X ,or new Fury X2,that is NVIDIA KILLER. LIKE RYZEN,BRUTAL INTEL KILLER


Average

4 years ago.

A tiny beast for a little fire ants. Still sold at exorbitantly high prices for RX 580-like performance which makes this not worth buying.


Average

4 years ago.

Great size and performance. Bad value today.


Good

3 years ago.

Small and reasonably powerful even in 2020. If power consumption isn't an issue and you need a small card, picking it up for cheap on the used market is the way to go.


Excellent

5 years ago.

In 2017 I have seen this GPU much cheaper and how it works is simply awesome, better than gtx 1060 6gb in my opinion Works really well for almost every game!


Excellent

5 years ago.

Got it for 200€. Great card, tiny and powerful. Bought this instead of nVidia due to freesync and I regret nothing.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback