Average Bench: 37.6% (56th of 549)

Based on 14,382 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 679A Models: AMD Radeon HD 7900, AMD Radeon HD 7950, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0), ASUS HD7950

Poor average bench

The AMD HD 7950 averaged 62.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 117fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 108fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD HD 7950 is just 14.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD HD 7950 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 74.1fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 56.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 14,382 samples)
Min Avg Max
91 Lighting 117 136
61.2 Reflection 74.1 84.5
117 Parallax 157 184
40.7% 116 fps
Min Avg Max
46.7 MRender 56.7 64.7
83.5 Gravity 108 125
69.1 Splatting 80.9 92.2
35.3% 81.9 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Lighting 128
Reflection 84.6
Parallax 182
46% 131 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 125
Splatting 92.4
41% 94.3 fps
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Lighting 125
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 166
43% 123 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 115
Splatting 85.1
38% 86.8 fps
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Lighting 121
Reflection 75.4
Parallax 166
42% 121 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 115
Splatting 84.9
38% 86.6 fps
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 124
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 163
43% 121 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 109
Splatting 84.3
36% 84 fps
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 120
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 161
42% 119 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 112
Splatting 82.8
36% 84.3 fps
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Lighting 113
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 150
39% 111 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 106
Splatting 77.9
34% 79.4 fps
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Lighting 113
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 151
39% 112 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 105
Splatting 77.7
34% 79.1 fps
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Lighting 107
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 113
34% 96.6 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 109
Splatting 84.8
36% 84.4 fps
14,382 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 6,179,726 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 14,382 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 20% 40% ± 5%
Sapphire(174B 3000) 16% 38% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E210) 9% 37% ± 5%
Sapphire(174B E249) 8% 40% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 5% 36% ± 6%
Sapphire(174B E207) 5% 36% ± 7%
XFX(1682 3220) 4% 37% ± 3%
Asus(1043 0428) 4% 39% ± 3%
MSI(1462 2773) 4% 39% ± 7%
XFX(1682 3221) 3% 36% ± 6%
MSI(1462 2761) 3% 37% ± 8%
PwrHis(1787 2316) 3% 36% ± 3%
AMD(1002 3000) 2% 33% ± 7%
MSI(1462 2771) 1% 38% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0B00) 1% 34% ± 6%
HP(103C 6616) 1% 32% ± 7%
Asus(1043 0424) 1% 31% ± 8%
Asus(1043 041E) 1% 37% ± 4%
XFX(1682 3222) 1% 36% ± 3%
Sapphire(174B E208) 1% 39% ± 3%
MSI(1462 2760) 1% 35% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0426) 1% 36% ± 4%
PwrHis(1787 2325) 0% 37% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 3000) 0% 37% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B A003) 0% 40% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2317) 0% 40% ± 0%
Device(1545 7950) 0% 34% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2772) 0% 38% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 38% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E219) 0% 37% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3003) 0% 12% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 229A) 0% 44% ± 0%
HP(103C 6617) 0% 34% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 5000) 0% 41% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 7950 Builds (Compare 6,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $340

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,121

Popular HD 7950 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

 Comments

Added 3 years ago.

Excellent

12 hrs ago.

Comment 

Высокий разгонный потенциал, после которого карточка взлетает по производительности очень высоко, Mantle и DirectX12. Идеальная карта по соотношению производительность/цена. Рекомендую брать со вторичного рынка—Oct '15


Good

9 days ago.

MUCH BETTER!


Terrible

4 months ago.

copd a faszom.com


Excellent

2 months ago.

The card is a beast on a budget, Get one and you won't regret it. It served me a good time before i sold it and Got a new GPU.


Terrible

2 months ago.

low & very high price


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 56 pages, please contribute.


549 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $313Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback