Average Bench: 38% (68th of 584)

Based on 15,395 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 679A Models: AMD Radeon HD 7900, AMD Radeon HD 7950, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0), ASUS HD7950

Poor average bench

The AMD HD 7950 averaged 61.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 118fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 110fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD HD 7950 is just 11.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD HD 7950 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 74.7fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 57.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 15,395 samples)
Min Avg Max
94.4 Lighting 118 137
64.7 Reflection 74.7 85.7
132 Parallax 159 188
41% 117 fps
Min Avg Max
50.7 MRender 57.5 65.2
97 Gravity 110 127
72.2 Splatting 81.9 93.4
35.8% 83 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 125
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 166
43% 123 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 111
Splatting 85.2
37% 85.4 fps
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Lighting 124
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 164
43% 122 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 107
Splatting 85
36% 83.9 fps
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Lighting 120
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 158
42% 117 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 112
Splatting 82.2
36% 84.3 fps
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 120
Reflection 75
Parallax 160
42% 118 fps
MRender 57.3
Gravity 112
Splatting 81.6
36% 83.5 fps
MSI(1462 2773) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Lighting 119
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 167
42% 120 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 109
Splatting 80.5
36% 82 fps
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver:
Lighting 113
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 159
40% 114 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 104
Splatting 76.4
34% 78.1 fps
15,395 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 8,329,656 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 15,395 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $290 @ launch in Jan '12)
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 20% 40% ± 3%
Sapphire(174B 3000) 18% 38% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E249) 8% 38% ± 6%
Sapphire(174B E210) 7% 37% ± 5%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 5% 36% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E207) 5% 37% ± 3%
XFX(1682 3221) 4% 38% ± 2%
Asus(1043 0428) 4% 37% ± 5%
PwrHis(1787 2316) 3% 37% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2773) 3% 41% ± 3%
MSI(1462 2761) 3% 38% ± 4%
XFX(1682 3220) 2% 39% ± 3%
XFX(1682 3222) 2% 35% ± 2%
AMD(1002 3000) 2% 37% ± 7%
MSI(1462 2771) 1% 38% ± 4%
Device(0000 0000) 1% 42% ± 5%
HP(103C 6616) 1% 34% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E208) 1% 40% ± 2%
AMD(1002 0B00) 1% 34% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0424) 1% 35% ± 3%
Asus(1043 0426) 1% 38% ± 0%
Asus(1043 041E) 1% 31% ± 6%
MSI(1462 2760) 1% 36% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2772) 0% 39% ± 1%
XFX(1682 3000) 0% 35% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E219) 0% 37% ± 0%
HP(103C 6617) 0% 42% ± 11%
Sapphire(174B A003) 0% 28% ± 0%
Device(1545 7950) 0% 44% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 225E) 0% 34% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 3001) 0% 47% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 7950 Builds (Compare 8,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $924

Popular HD 7950 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

Added 3 years ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

8 days ago.

Very good card. Aged exceptionally well and still chews through modern AAA games.


Excellent

13 days ago.

Comment 

Высокий разгонный потенциал, после которого карточка взлетает по производительности очень высоко, Mantle и DirectX12. Идеальная карта по соотношению производительность/цена. Рекомендую брать со вторичного рынка—Oct '15


Good

4 days ago.

The card is a beast on a budget, Get one and you won't regret it. It served me a good time before i sold it and Got a new GPU.


Terrible

6 months ago.

low & very high price


Your
opinion?
584 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $310Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback