Average Bench: 8.21% (221st of 555)

Based on 4,014 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0DD8 Model: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro 2000 averaged 91.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 25.6fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 22.5fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro 2000 is just 0.73%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro 2000 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 22.9fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 19.6fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,014 samples)
Min Avg Max
21.4 Lighting 22.5 23.2
21.5 Reflection 22.9 23.5
17.8 Parallax 19.9 22.5
6.67% 21.8 fps
Min Avg Max
19.4 MRender 20.2 21.1
22.8 Gravity 25.6 24.5
19 Splatting 19.6 19.8
9.33% 21.8 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.56
Lighting 23
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 20.5
7% 22.3 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 20
9% 21.8 fps
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 368.86
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 20.4
7% 22.2 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 19.8
9% 21.6 fps
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.3
7% 22.1 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 19.6
9% 21.5 fps
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.11
Lighting 23
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 20.5
7% 22.3 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 19.8
9% 21.4 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.3
7% 22.1 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 19.7
9% 21.4 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 20.3
7% 22.2 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 19.5
9% 21.3 fps
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1,024MB
Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 320.9
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 19.8
6% 21 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 19.4
9% 21.4 fps
4,014 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 7,417,032 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 4,014 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 58% 8% ± 2%
HP(103C 084A) 42% 8% ± 2%
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 0% 8% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro 2000 Builds (Compare 2,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $482

Popular Quadro 2000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

6 months ago.

Not Good Enough


Excellent

14 days ago.

is very good


Your
opinion?
555 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $313Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback