Average Bench: 2.27% (436th of 595)

Based on 6,528 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1040, 10DE 0DE4 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 520 averaged 97.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 6.95fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 7.26fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 520 is just 0.92%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 520 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 7.17fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 4.46fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,528 samples)
Min Avg Max
5.5 Lighting 6.95 8
5.4 Reflection 7.17 8.1
1.6 Parallax 4.46 6.4
1.87% 6.19 fps
Min Avg Max
4.6 MRender 5.72 7.2
6.16 Gravity 7.26 7.5
3.26 Splatting 4.74 6.3
2.57% 5.91 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Device(1B0A 90AA) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 8
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.4
2% 7.43 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.2
3% 6.87 fps
Device(1B0A 90AA) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.5
2% 7.37 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.3
3% 6.9 fps
Device(1B0A 90AA) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Lighting 8
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 4.5
2% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.3
3% 6.9 fps
EVGA(3842 1521) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8
Parallax 4.4
2% 6.73 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 5.4
3% 6.43 fps
EVGA(3842 1526) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 5.9
2% 6.7 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 4.2
2% 5.33 fps
EVGA(3842 1525) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 5.9
2% 6.73 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 4.1
2% 5.3 fps
XFX(1682 301A) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6
2% 6.67 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 4.3
2% 5 fps
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 0.2
1% 4.53 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 4.3
2% 5.43 fps
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.9
1% 4.4 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 3.1
2% 4.37 fps
6,528 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 10,937,448 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 6,528 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Device(0000 0000) 16% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83A0) 9% 2% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90AA) 6% 3% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1525) 6% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2630) 6% 2% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1529) 5% 2% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 4% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83D2) 4% 2% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1526) 4% 2% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 3214) 4% 2% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0915) 4% 2% ± 1%
XFX(1682 301A) 3% 2% ± 1%
PNY(196E 0915) 3% 2% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 0401) 2% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 352E) 2% 3% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 2222) 2% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 352F) 2% 2% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 522C) 2% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2632) 2% 2% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 5213) 2% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1521) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1222) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83D4) 1% 2% ± 2%
Gainward(10B0 1401) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83D7) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3520) 1% 3% ± 1%
Device(1B4C 0915) 1% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 3214) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83C6) 1% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2029) 1% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1214) 1% 2% ± 0%
Device(107D 2735) 1% 2% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 8097) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83BD) 0% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3521) 0% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83D3) 0% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1215) 0% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8097) 0% 2% ± 1%
Asus(1043 83C1) 0% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83C5) 0% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83DA) 0% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1527) 0% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1528) 0% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1524) 0% 2% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 5223) 0% 2% ± 0%
Device(1642 3A98) 0% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 8096) 0% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 520 Builds (Compare 27,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $381

Popular GeForce GT 520 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor

11 months ago.

It's not really useful now in 2017, It's too old and has too lower performance


Your
opinion?
595 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $167SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback