Average Bench: 27.1% (78th of 540)

Based on 7,228 user benchmarks.  Devices: 1002 6658, 1002 665D Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 260, ASUS R7 260X

Very poor average bench

The AMD R7 260X averaged 72.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 51.5fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 76.8fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 260X is just 7.58%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 260X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 76.5fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 69.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 7,228 samples)
Min Avg Max
64.3 Lighting 76.8 86.8
68.6 Reflection 76.5 85.7
83.1 Parallax 99.7 114
26% 84.4 fps
Min Avg Max
42.4 MRender 51.5 59.9
58.6 Gravity 69.5 78.2
51.8 Splatting 70.1 80.1
28.4% 63.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MaxC: 1200 MHz, MaxM: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 86.3
Parallax 113
30% 95.9 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 79.6
34% 73.2 fps
PwrHis(1787 2339) 2GB
MaxC: 1160 MHz, MaxM: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Lighting 82.9
Reflection 82.2
Parallax 106
28% 90.5 fps
MRender 48.6
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 74
28% 65.6 fps
Asus(1043 0499) 1GB
MaxC: 1075 MHz, MaxM: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Lighting 80
Reflection 78
Parallax 102
27% 86.7 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 75
32% 67.7 fps
MaxC: 1075 MHz, MaxM: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 102
27% 86.3 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 73.7
31% 67.1 fps
MaxC: 1050 MHz, MaxM: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 95.9
26% 82.7 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 69
Splatting 70.3
30% 64.9 fps
Asus(1043 04D3) 2GB
MaxC: 1075 MHz, MaxM: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Lighting 77
Reflection 75
Parallax 99.4
26% 83.8 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 70
Splatting 65.2
27% 61.8 fps
7,228 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 3,493,210 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 7,228 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E258) 31% 26% ± 2%
SAPPHIRE R7 260X 2GB OC 2x DVI
11222-22-20G
SAPPHIRE R7 260X 2GB OC
11222-06-20G
XFX(1682 7260) 15% 27% ± 3%
XFX 260X 2GB
R7260XCNF4
MSI(1462 2935) 10% 28% ± 2%
MSI R7 260X 2GB OC
R7 260X 2GD5 OC
PwrHis(1787 2339) 8% 27% ± 2%
Asus(1043 048F) 5% 29% ± 6%
Gigabyte(1458 2271) 4% 29% ± 3%
MSI(1462 293A) 4% 24% ± 3%
Asus(1043 04D3) 4% 26% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E253) 3% 29% ± 2%
Asus(1043 04A9) 3% 24% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 200F) 2% 25% ± 5%
Gigabyte(1458 227B) 2% 28% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 22A9) 2% 28% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 2274) 1% 30% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0499) 1% 27% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2296) 1% 30% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 2275) 1% 30% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B00) 1% 28% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0491) 1% 28% ± 0%
Asus(1043 045A) 1% 23% ± 9%
Device(1545 7260) 0% 29% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 228B) 0% 31% ± 0%
Asus(1043 04CB) 0% 31% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2938) 0% 30% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0458) 0% 27% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 260X Builds (Compare 5,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $319

Popular R7 260X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

540 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $238Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $229Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $170
Intel Pentium G4560 $60Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $219Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $48Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback