Average Bench: 28.1% (83rd of 555)

Based on 3,097 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6819 Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 265

Very poor average bench

The AMD R7 265 averaged 71.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 82.8fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 106fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 265 is just 5.41%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 265 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 76.9fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 56.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,097 samples)
Min Avg Max
77.5 Lighting 82.8 94.1
72.1 Reflection 76.9 87.4
99.5 Parallax 106 119
28.3% 88.7 fps
Min Avg Max
53 MRender 56.1 63.1
63 Gravity 66.6 75.2
76.1 Splatting 80.6 91.3
28% 67.8 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.9.1
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 89.1
Parallax 123
33% 103 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 90.1
31% 75.5 fps
Asus(1043 3011) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Lighting 94
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 117
32% 99.3 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 90.6
32% 76.3 fps
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Lighting 85
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 108
29% 90.6 fps
MRender 57.3
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 82.9
29% 69.5 fps
PwrHis(1787 2650) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Lighting 85
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 108
29% 90.4 fps
MRender 57.4
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 81.8
28% 68.8 fps
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Lighting 84
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 107
29% 89.7 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 81.1
28% 68.1 fps
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Lighting 80
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 103
27% 86.8 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 79.8
28% 66.9 fps
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.2
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 101
27% 84.5 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 77.8
27% 65.5 fps
3,097 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 7,366,688 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 3,097 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $150 @ launch in Feb '14)
Sapphire(174B A001) 53% 28% ± 2%
Sapphire R7 265 2GB Dual-X
11232-00-20G
AmazonUS $20214 months
Asus(1043 3011) 20% 28% ± 2%
MSI(1462 3058) 13% 29% ± 2%
MSI R7 265 2GB OC
R7 265 2GD5 OC
AmazonUS $15021 months
PwrHis(1787 3000) 4% 29% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 3000) 4% 27% ± 5%
XFX(1682 7267) 3% 28% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 2650) 2% 27% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 229E) 1% 30% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 265 Builds (Compare 11,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $445

Popular R7 265 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

Added 2 years ago.

Terrible

4 months ago.

low perfomance for that price


Excellent

9 months ago.

I love it :)


Your
opinion?
555 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $145
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback