Average Bench: 11.7% (159th of 542)

Based on 4,595 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6610 Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 250

Terrible average bench

The AMD R7 250 averaged 88.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 22.1fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 44.5fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 250 is just 3.65%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 250 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 30.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 30.2fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,595 samples)
Min Avg Max
27.2 Lighting 32.4 37.1
25.3 Reflection 30.8 35.1
37.3 Parallax 44.5 48.9
11.3% 35.9 fps
Min Avg Max
14.8 MRender 22.1 28.8
26.4 Gravity 30.2 32.6
20.1 Splatting 26.8 33.3
11.8% 26.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
PwrHis(1787 2334) 1GB
MaxC: 1100 MHz, MaxM: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 48.5
12% 39.1 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 33.4
15% 31 fps
PwrHis(1787 2334) 1GB
MaxC: 1080 MHz, MaxM: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 46.6
12% 38.7 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 32.5
15% 30.6 fps
Asus(1043 0462) 1GB
MaxC: 1050 MHz, MaxM: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 45.9
12% 38.1 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 32.1
15% 30.3 fps
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 46.2
12% 38.1 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 31.9
15% 30.8 fps
MSI(1462 3011) 2GB
MaxC: 1100 MHz, MaxM: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 30
Parallax 51.7
12% 38.1 fps
MRender 17.1
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 22.9
9% 24 fps
Asus(1043 04BD) 2GB
MaxC: 1110 MHz, MaxM: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 31
Parallax 47.4
12% 37.1 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 31
Splatting 22.8
9% 23.6 fps
MSI(1462 3011) 2GB
MaxC: 1100 MHz, MaxM: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 44.8
11% 35 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 22.2
9% 23.1 fps
4,595 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 4,035,139 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 4,595 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E266) 18% 12% ± 2%
Asus(1043 0462) 15% 12% ± 1%
XFX(1682 7250) 14% 11% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3011) 11% 11% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E269) 9% 11% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 2334) 7% 11% ± 2%
Asus(1043 04BD) 5% 11% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 226E) 3% 13% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2270) 3% 12% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3020) 2% 13% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2014) 2% 12% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 22BF) 2% 11% ± 0%
Dell(1028 2120) 2% 11% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3002) 1% 13% ± 0%
Device(17AF 2001) 1% 12% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0123) 1% 12% ± 1%
Device(1545 7250) 1% 12% ± 1%
AMD(1002 2B0A) 0% 13% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2012) 0% 11% ± 0%
Device(1642 3F09) 0% 12% ± 2%
Diamond(1092 0250) 0% 9% ± 4%
Diamond(1092 2500) 0% 12% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 0B0E) 0% 13% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 250 Builds (Compare 4,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $132

Popular R7 250 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

542 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $231AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $253Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $169
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $40HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback