Average Bench: 10.5% (209th of 592)

Based on 2,721 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0FFE Model: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K2000 averaged 89.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 30.4fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 27fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K2000 is just 1.36%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K2000 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 21.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 26.9fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,721 samples)
Min Avg Max
24.4 Lighting 27 28
20.1 Reflection 21.7 22.2
28.9 Parallax 32.5 34.2
8.97% 27.1 fps
Min Avg Max
24.3 MRender 25.1 25.6
25 Gravity 30.4 33.4
25.9 Splatting 26.9 27.3
11.7% 27.5 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 34.2
9% 28 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 27.2
12% 28.6 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.74
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 34
9% 27.9 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 27.2
12% 28.4 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 34.1
9% 27.9 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 33
Splatting 27.1
12% 28.4 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 34.2
9% 27.5 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 26.9
12% 28.4 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 33.7
9% 27.8 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 26.9
12% 28 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 33.3
9% 27.4 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 26.8
12% 28.1 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 22
Parallax 32.4
9% 27.3 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 27
11% 25.7 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.58
Lighting 15
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 33.3
7% 23.1 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 32
Splatting 26.8
12% 27.9 fps
2,721 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 9,271,562 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 2,721 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 50% 10% ± 1%
HP(103C 094C) 50% 11% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K2000 Builds (Compare 2,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $345

Popular Quadro K2000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

3 months ago.

It does the games bad lol lmao xd


Your
opinion?
592 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $138
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback