Average Bench: 7.67% (231st of 555)

Based on 11,863 user benchmarks.  Devices: 1002 6613, 1002 6611 Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 240, AMD Radeon R7 240

Terrible average bench

The AMD R7 240 averaged 92.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 22fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 19.5fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 240 is just 4.29%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 240 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 22.5fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 19.2fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 11,863 samples)
Min Avg Max
14.2 Lighting 22 25.4
10.4 Reflection 22.5 26.3
21.2 Parallax 29.6 34.1
7.63% 24.7 fps
Min Avg Max
7.65 MRender 16.2 22
14.5 Gravity 19.5 23
7.38 Splatting 19.2 25.8
7.7% 18.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.2
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 33.3
8% 27.7 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 19.7
8% 18.9 fps
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 33.3
8% 27.4 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 19.6
8% 18.7 fps
Asus(1043 04C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 30.2
8% 25.7 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 19.8
8% 18.5 fps
XFX(1682 7240) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 29.3
8% 24.6 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 19
Splatting 18.6
7% 17.6 fps
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.2
Lighting 0
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 31.2
4% 18.5 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 19.4
8% 18.3 fps
11,863 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 7,369,395 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 11,863 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E263) 16% 7% ± 1%
Asus(1043 048B) 15% 8% ± 1%
XFX(1682 7240) 10% 7% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E266) 8% 8% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 8% 8% ± 1%
MSI(1462 8094) 7% 7% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2335) 7% 7% ± 2%
Device(1B0A 90D3) 6% 8% ± 1%
Asus(1043 04C5) 3% 8% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0123) 2% 7% ± 1%
Asus(1043 04BB) 2% 8% ± 1%
Device(1642 3D79) 2% 8% ± 1%
Asus(1043 869E) 1% 8% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B 4248) 1% 8% ± 0%
Asus(1043 85F1) 1% 8% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2012) 1% 7% ± 0%
Device(17AF 2000) 1% 8% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 226B) 1% 9% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90DF) 1% 8% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0000) 1% 9% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B 0B0E) 1% 13% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E280) 1% 8% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0541) 1% 9% ± 0%
Asus(1043 85B3) 0% 8% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90CB) 0% 9% ± 1%
Device(85B3 1043) 0% 8% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 228A) 0% 8% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2000) 0% 7% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90C4) 0% 8% ± 0%
Asus(1043 04CF) 0% 5% ± 0%
Diamond(1092 0240) 0% 7% ± 0%
Dell(1028 1002) 0% 8% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E293) 0% 5% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 7430) 0% 9% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 1352) 0% 9% ± 0%
Diamond(1092 2400) 0% 7% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2014) 0% 8% ± 0%
Device(1545 7240) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 240 Builds (Compare 7,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $126

Popular R7 240 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

9 hrs ago.

Worst video card I have ever owned. Bought a GT 710 2GB ddr3 and it outperformed and overclocked better. Stay away from this card.


Excellent

17 days ago.

Ахуенная карта ебет gt 730 в анал жестко.


Good

17 days ago.

Brilliant for the price!


Good

14 days ago.

GZÜEL


Average

2 months ago.

Its really cheap for a video card but it worth its price, I played destiny 2 with lowest graphics and above 20 fps... If you can buy a better one, do it


Terrible

1 month ago.

Runs quite hot and fails to run even basic games might be worth getting if prices fall through the floor good enough for non- gaming tasks. able to run games from 2012 anything more recent is too much for this card.


Good

26 days ago.

Economic and powerful, noiseless and good cooling


Terrible

1 month ago.

Bok gibi


Excellent

2 months ago.

is


Excellent

3 months ago.

A melhor placa para quem não quer gastar dinheiro e jogar!


Your
opinion?
555 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback