Average Bench: 1.92% (402nd of 543)

Based on 142 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 040D Model: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M averaged 98.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 7.95fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 6.36fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M is just 1.44%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 10.6fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 4.47fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 142 samples)
Min Avg Max
2.8 Lighting 6.36 7.1
3.79 Reflection 10.6 12.2
1.1 Parallax 2.44 2.98
1.4% 6.48 fps
Min Avg Max
1.6 MRender 7.95 11.8
1.7 Gravity 4.47 4.9
3.2 Splatting 8.26 9.58
4.1% 6.89 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.95
Lighting 7
Reflection 12
Parallax 2.6
2% 7.2 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.6
6% 8.3 fps
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Lighting 7
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 2.6
2% 7.13 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.7
6% 8.3 fps
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.95
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 2.2
2% 7.13 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.9
6% 8.43 fps
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Lighting 7
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 2.6
2% 7.13 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.7
6% 8.23 fps
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Lighting 7
Reflection 12
Parallax 2.6
2% 7.2 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.3
5% 8 fps
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Lighting 7
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 2.6
2% 7.1 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.6
5% 8.03 fps
Dell(1028 019B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.0
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 2.5
1% 5.97 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.5
4% 6.47 fps
Dell(1028 019B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 2.7
2% 6.97 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.6
3% 6.1 fps
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8624
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 3.2 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.5
2% 3.43 fps
142 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 4,343,374 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 142 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Dell(1028 019B) 51% 2% ± 0%
HP(103C 30C3) 47% 2% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 0902) 1% 2% ± 0%
Device(161F 2052) 1% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro FX 1600M Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $120

Popular Quadro FX 1600M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 29 pages, please contribute.


543 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
Intel Core i5-7600K $238Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $132SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $131SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback