Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 117 2-Core 209 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 565 61% 486 Pts	64-Core 560 35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 38.4 39% 39.2 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 37 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 370 Write 348 Mixed 306 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 44.9 160% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 310 238% 325 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 209GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 87 86 88 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 72.7 Write 76 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 86.8 52% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 1x8GB 4,896 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.6% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	58x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	57x
PSD44G213381 2x4GBPatriotBench 71%, 1,250 samples	48x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $368

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16