| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161118 |
| Uptime | 16.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 03 '18 at 03:43 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60%
Above average
|
54% 85.8 Pts
|
33% 272 Pts
|
20% 328 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 3774) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.9%
Below average
|
33% 42.3 fps
|
35% 44 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 102 102 105 105 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
39% 175 MB/s
|
103% 33.1 MB/s
|
34% 46.6 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
879GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 104 103 105 105 MB/s
|
77.7%
Very good
|
82% 113 MB/s
|
114% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
|
43.4%
Average
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
27% 9.33 GB/s
|
54% 73.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
| Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $144 |