PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110510 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 04 '18 at 07:51 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 842C) 1GB
CLim: 1033 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.36
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 117 119 119 112 MB/s
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
488GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 111 113 113 112 MB/s
|
66.6%
Good
|
|||
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.4 MB/s
|
4.56%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 78x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 69x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 66x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 71x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 46x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |