Hp-pavilion KA771AA-ABU m9170.uk-a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KA771AA-ABU m9170.uk-a (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek NARRA3
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080415
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '16 at 17:41
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9500 1,146 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Memory 3.21 1-Core 32 2-Core 63.1 16% 32.8 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 127 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4550 3,005 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 0298) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: CR10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7808 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5569 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10710 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3257 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 3554355 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 66914 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C2) HDA temperature 130 106 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3554355 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	32.8% Below average	Read 39.7 Write 74.7 Mixed 40 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.83 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 44%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 150GB free, PID 070c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 14.4 Write 15.1 Mixed 14.7 19% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.27 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 472 8% 472 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion KA771AA-ABU m9170.uk-a

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)