Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade Stealth
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171103
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 17:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 99%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 128
60% 97 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 255
28% 221 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.4% Good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 92.4
69% 90.7 fps
MRender 80.2
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 84.7
67% 81.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 88%
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1A58 6753) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 6.78
6% 7.82 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 14.5
8% 9.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 190 184 180 174 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 969
Mixed 612
SusWrite 210
176% 798 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 48.5
183% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 713
557% 785 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 161%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.7% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback