Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '18 at 17:25
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 144
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 434
40% 337 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Asus(1043 0344) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 12.9
12% 13 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.8
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,971
Write 3210
Mixed 3,240
773% 3,474 MB/s
4K Read 330
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 50.6
694% 208 MB/s
DQ Read 575
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 572
417% 543 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
624GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 137 138 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 131
Mixed 106
SusWrite 138
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
204% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 109%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
849GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 145 145 145 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 149
Mixed 109
SusWrite 145
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 86%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
448GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 75.1
Write 62.2
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 63.7
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback