PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 16.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20160128 |
Uptime | 5.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 08 '18 at 16:07 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 55 87 103 47 46 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
240GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 41 55 82 90 75 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$24
36GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 24 36 50 53 46 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
44.6%
Average
|
||||
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
63GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 34 50 73 79 67 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 100x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 35x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 18x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 15x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |