Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit, , Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 18:24
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 197
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 586
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 6.88
3% 5.71 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.43
5% 5.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
MSI(1462 2983) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.9% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 88.9
55% 73.6 fps
MRender 76.3
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 49.9
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 985
Write 810
Mixed 442
165% 745 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 33.4
133% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 42.9
44% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
171GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 210 184 177 209 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 245
Write 202
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 197
125% 173 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
374% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 127%
Great: 213%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
145GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 99 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 136
Write 110
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 99.9
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
122GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 68
Write 52.3
Mixed 50
SusWrite 66.5
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 83%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
119GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 82 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 87.7
Write 82.3
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 84.8
113% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 5.4
345% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1923 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback