Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 23:43
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 155
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 486
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1555 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 66.9
57% 70.1 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 69
Splatting 58.4
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 86 89 83 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 293
Write 369
Mixed 293
SusWrite 86.4
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 36.5
121% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 70.9
DQ Mixed 44
36% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
236GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 110 113 112 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64% Good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 112
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64%
Great: 85%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
167GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 88 89 83 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 99
Write 94.7
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 87
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 113 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 150
Write 132
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 113
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback