PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Ah |
Memory | 13 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 21 '18 at 09:08 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 760-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 64 60 61 60 59 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
1GB free, PID 0122
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 5.6 4.7 5.6 5.7 MB/s
|
4.06%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.5%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $100Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 387x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 73x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 60x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 285x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 65x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 55x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 30x |
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 18x |
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $128 |