Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T5500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0CRH6C
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 10:59
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 155
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 620
55% 465 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 3.53
3% 3.99 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 73 98 61 68 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 172
Write 92.3
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 92
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 10.3
46% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 28.2
DQ Mixed 23.8
17% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 85%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
909GB free
Firmware: 03.00C12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63% Good
Read 112
Write 103
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 107
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 16.3
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.6
7% 7 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
181% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 12%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB
12GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 6.1 12 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 12.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 10
15% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 8%
Lexar JumpDrive 16GB
15GB free, PID a817
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.1 5 5 5 5.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5
10% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 7%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
34GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 8.1 12 12 12 6.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Read 21
Write 8.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 9.1
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 9 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T5500 Builds (Compare 1,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback