ADD TO PC
BUILD

Doghouse 010989

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Doghouse 010989 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P7xxDM(-G)
Memory	22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160801
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '18 at 22:28
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 138 58% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 377 38% 308 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Clevo(1558 7502) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 31.1 8% 17.5 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 43.8 Splatting 51.9 37% 44.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 473GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 379 385 397 393 400 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 408 Mixed 385 SusWrite 389 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 47.7 154% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 49.6 122% 257 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 666GB free Firmware: JB0O SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 107 107 107 108 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 108 Write 109 Mixed 24 SusWrite 107 63% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 4,393 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	71.5% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.6 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 17.4 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 82.4 49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback