Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '18 at 08:48
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 73
2-Core 134
59% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 20.8
19% 20.7 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 23
Splatting 17.5
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 212 223 221 202 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 436
Mixed 306
SusWrite 240
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 50.3
170% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 254
187% 244 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
616GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 188 186 186 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 178
Mixed 98
SusWrite 186
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.3
Write 39.2
Mixed 70.3
78% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GNT Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.4
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback