Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '18 at 21:40
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 897
83% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 203
Parallax 183
148% 189 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 180
Splatting 130
119% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
590GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1426 1185 1194 1194 1192 1190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,067
Write 1,812
Mixed 927
SusWrite 1,230
337% 1,509 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 64.4
239% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 1073
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 949
727% 987 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 276%
Great: 302%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
678GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 117 118 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 106
SusWrite 118
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
185GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 103 101 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 147
Write 124
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 102
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
660GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 189 185 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 137
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 188
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 136 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 132
Mixed 93
SusWrite 138
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
767GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 106 108 109 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 52
SusWrite 107
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 32.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 29.1
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback