Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 18:34
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 914
87% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 59.8
50% 62.8 fps
MRender 73.2
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 54.1
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1309 1324 1330 1333 1323 1308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,033
Write 1436
Mixed 819
SusWrite 1,321
313% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 58.7
216% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,157
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 444
414% 663 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 263%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 449 450 451 449 444 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 454
Mixed 366
SusWrite 448
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64.6
218% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
931GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 471 485 469 483 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 470
Mixed 394
SusWrite 477
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 66.6
222% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 229 229 234 235 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 227 229 229 231 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 144 145 144 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 143
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 144
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $926
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback