PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K (all builds) |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20070703 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 11 '18 at 17:35 |
Run Duration | 303 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
30%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 112 98 114 95 105 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
469GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 110 105 133 107 122 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
17GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 53 52 70 67 73 MB/s
|
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 91x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 34x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 13x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $285 |