Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 13:29
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3670 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 84.1
44% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 162
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03F2) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 8.37
Reflection 8.04
Parallax 7.03
7% 7.81 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6.39
6% 6.71 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 160 117 51 61 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 364
Write 308
Mixed 255
SusWrite 112
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 24.7
87% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 204
160% 224 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
437GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 165 171 173 165 172 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 184 191 196 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 156
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 186
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
140GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 142 141 142 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 140
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 141
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback