Toshiba Satellite C645

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C645 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '18 at 12:07
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 89.3 1-Core 21 2-Core 69.6 42% 60 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 155 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FCF0) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 0.81 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66 9,402 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 460GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 34 37 34 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 19.9 Mixed 15.4 SusWrite 35.2 18% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 45%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.5 4.6 4.7 5.3 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.97% Terrible	Read 16 Write 6 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 4.3 10% 8.88 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB1333D3S9SR8/2G 1x2GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.7% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C645 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C645

CPU
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	19x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	7x
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	36x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	5x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	3x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	7x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GBUnknownBench 22%, 21 samples	7x
M471B5273CH0-CF8 1x4GBSamsungBench 19%, 426 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 4GBUnknownBench 21%, 23 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16