Asus G53SX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus G53SX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G53SX
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 19:35
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 145
60% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 350
37% 294 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 13B7) 2GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 359.6
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 7.47
8% 9.2 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 10
Splatting 10.5
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 72 71 71 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 122
Write 58.1
Mixed 116
SusWrite 73.8
21% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 21.2
66% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 87.2
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 75.4
60% 84 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
6GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 70 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 50.5
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 68
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.9 4.7 5 5.1 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 2.8
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 4.8
6% 5 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 5%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
201GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 24 25 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 29
Write 22.9
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 24.1
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G53SX Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G53SX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback