| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20150526 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 23 '18 at 17:27 |
| Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
88.2%
Excellent
|
84% 149 Pts
|
62% 466 Pts
|
29% 471 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84AD) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 411.63
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
16% 17.5 fps
|
16% 19.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 104 55 56 67 60 MB/s
|
75.7%
Very good
|
65% 292 MB/s
|
143% 57.2 MB/s
|
135% 208 MB/s
|
|
|
42.2%
Average
|
49% 66.6 MB/s
|
153% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
35.5%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
72% 55.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,847 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 563x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 236x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 266x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 208x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 169x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $345 |