PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150904 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '18 at 19:46 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
PowerColor(148C 3000) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$30
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 36 32 28 37 63 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
77GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 96 93 101 95 MB/s
|
40.5%
Average
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 32GB
0GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 0.9 4.4 0.8 0.2 5.9 MB/s
|
3.11%
Terrible
|
|||
ST950032 5AS 500GB
70GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 32 32 33 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
46.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 49x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 30x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $253 |