| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 8.99% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150508 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 30 '18 at 06:30 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
32.7%
Below average
|
31% 48.1 Pts
|
16% 126 Pts
|
11% 173 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.2%
Poor
|
26% 36.4 fps
|
33% 41.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 26 33 21 23 24 MB/s
|
8.99%
Terrible
|
15% 66.1 MB/s
|
9% 2.7 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
60GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 37 52 28 34 37 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
33% 44.8 MB/s
|
79% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
771GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 46 26 30 31 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
40% 55.7 MB/s
|
185% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
28.9%
Poor
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
11% 3.97 GB/s
|
23% 174 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A88M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 18 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples | 3x |
| A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples | 2x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 380AMD $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples | 2x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 2x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $287 |