Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime23.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '16 at 13:16
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 90.5
48% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 338
29% 248 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 3GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 1.66
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 250GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 494
Write 341
Mixed 353
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 16.5
87% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 45.4
DQ Mixed 16
19% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 79
Write 134
Mixed 113
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.29
79% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 72%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
268GB free
Firmware: APGNT517 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 89.6
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.41
99% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 120%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
195GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 117
Write 97
Mixed 165
97% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.22
80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
41GB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 122
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.28
82% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
22GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 139
Mixed 102
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.19
64% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 113%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -0 16GB
15GB free, PID 0306
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 16.6
Write 9.35
Mixed 11.2
15% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.62
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.17
25% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback