Asus F1A55-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M LE (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120930
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '16 at 23:53
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 651 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 80.4 44% 66.4 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 126 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Gigabyte(1458 353C) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 43.1 Parallax 56.1 3% 34.2 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 40.2 25% 28.6 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1099 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 101 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 49 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 88 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5558844486	42.7% Average	Read 224 Write 182 Mixed 175 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 16.1 68% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 20 23% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 930GB free Firmware: 1AA01109 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 1 (03) Spinup time 76 76 8000 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1336 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2856 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1121 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 99 1 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 7 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 58 621740069 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 638517284 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 297583 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	54.6% Above average	Read 93.1 Write 96.9 Mixed 68.2 64% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.53 4K Mixed 0.45 124% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB 1,116 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.5% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M LE Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE

CPU
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	8x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	6x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	4x

SSD
MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 83%, 1,792 samples	2x
SSDPR-CL100-240-G2 240GBBench 68%, 1,204 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 56 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16