Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '16 at 23:31
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 32.5
50% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 413
37% 314 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.6% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 33.2
24% 29.8 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 29
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 467
Write 313
Mixed 328
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 16.1
98% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 16.2
20% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Constellation CS ISE 1TB
776GB free
Firmware: CE03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 182
Mixed 174
137% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.17
94% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Sony Card_R/W 64GB
48GB free, PID 03cc
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 9.32
Mixed 19.8
20% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.73
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.68
67% 1.76 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 21%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
6GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 136
Write 66
Mixed 89.1
113% 97 MB/s
4K Read 5.62
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 1.24
146% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 13.1
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback