Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results

Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 61%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4/3.1  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160303
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJul 28 '16 at 06:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$350
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
73.2% Very good
SC Int 88.6
SC Float 99.2
SC Mixed 95.5
76% 94.4 Pts
QC Int 312
QC Float 323
QC Mixed 352
74% 329 Pts
MC Int 670
MC Float 745
MC Mixed 730
107% 715 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 99.7
25% 79.4 fps
MRender 80.8
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 62.2
31% 73.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 32%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend MTS600 M.2 512GB-$530
189GB free
Firmware: N1126KB Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 425
Mixed 459
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 36.4
132% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 71.2
102% 190 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 98%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 110
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.25
88% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 97%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$120
480GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 110
Write 114
Mixed 117
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.25
104% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 40.9
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 102%
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,383
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $325Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $144
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback