Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '16 at 02:29
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 54 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 47.6 29% 42.1 Pts	4-Core 91.7 8-Core 150 15% 121 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 45.2 27% 37.7 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 31.7 Splatting 40 28% 34 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 49 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 34 (A3) Unknown 100 100 260 (94) Unknown 100 100 10662 (95) Unknown 100 100 165 (96) Unknown 100 100 0 (97) Unknown 100 100 144 (A4) Unknown 100 100 4342 (A5) Unknown 100 100 14 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 45273974571042 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 17262 (F2) Unknown 100 100 7738 (F5) Unknown 100 100 25644 (F6) Unknown 100 100 21324 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	47.9% Average	Read 417 Write 238 Mixed 247 66% 301 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 21 4K Mixed 8.93 54% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 26.3 DQ Mixed 19.9 16% 23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 91%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 404GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 161 4800 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5963 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18551 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5372 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 194 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5959 (C2) HDA temperature 112 96 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40% Average	Read 71.9 Write 67.3 Mixed 74.1 54% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.37 98% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 65%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB 4,621 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 300GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 164803849 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4958 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 76 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 63511437 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15581 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 37 4961 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 3 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 555810849 (C2) HDA temperature 33 41 55834574881 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 18 164803849 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -17931488432076 (F1) Unknown 100 253 816389945 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3845113656	51% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 88.3 Mixed 92.6 68% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.54 112% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x8GB 3,774 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 13.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16