| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Toshiba Satellite Pro C660 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PWWAA |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120509 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 04 '16 at 16:47 |
| Run Duration | 240 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.6%
Average
|
44% 72.2 Pts
|
20% 149 Pts
|
9% 150 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2827
|
0.84%
Terrible
|
1% 0.97 fps
|
1% 1.25 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
505GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
47.5%
Average
|
56% 74.5 MB/s
|
56% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
38GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
7.02%
Terrible
|
13% 8.37 MB/s
|
84% 2.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.7%
Poor
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
16% 5.7 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite Pro C660 Builds (Compare 74 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C660
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 22x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 15x |
| Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 37x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 17x |
| GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |